Out4Blood & El_Cap's Rise of Nations Strategy |
O4B Rankings <-- NEW! BHG Player Ratings Civ-specific Strategy British Chinese Strategy Links RON Heaven Forum RON @ MFO RON Universe PCA Clan website RON Oracle Anarchy Unlimited Infidels Clan website RON Francophone Alliance TWC Clan website BHG RON Home BHG RON Strategy MS RON Official Home Apolyton RON Forum RON Revolution RON Planet RON_Endurence RON Xtreme! RON Empire Recorded Games MFO: Rec Games RON Universe Rec Games PCA clan Rec Games RON Oracle Rec Games Infidels Rec games AU Clan Rec games Carch's Rec Games RTSUK Rec Games BLuT Clan Rec Games Blog Related The Truth Laid Bear |
Tuesday, November 04, 2003 We get mentioned!
Over at the Infidels Rise of Nations Recorded Games site, someone posted a 3v4 game I played with the TWC boys. It was supposed to be a 3v5, but one of the opposing players dropped at the start, so we played on. Not much to look at, but I just stumbled on this and so thought I'd mention it.
<RANT> It did spark a discussion I had with Tann: why do players SO OPPOSE playing with skill settings? Instead of playing with 3v5, why not just do +10 skill settings? Hmmmm? I was in another game with 3 BLUTs, 2 TWCs, and me. I suggested BLUTs vs., but they wouldn't have any of it. "We got a newbie on our side," was the response. !??! So random teams is better?! Why not just use the skill settings and play set teams. That way you can start to develop some clan/team strategies. Something that seems sorely lacking. And even if you don't do set teams, shouldn't you still use the skill setting to balance out poor players?! Isn't that what it's for?! I think so, but that's just my opinion, I could be wrong. </RANT>
Comments:
Post a Comment
|